SOPA/PIPA

Long time no post… sorry… lots of life has happened and I should really get on this… maybe a summary post will be incoming. Anyway, to my topic.

I know all of my friends know about SOPA and PIPA so I won’t go into the discussion about it. My opinions of them are harsh and I’m more than a little offended that alleged conservatives in the House and Senate support the bill. That said, I actually wrote a letter to my Congressperson and Senator yesterday (via email) and received a very disappointing reply from my Senator (Kay Hagan – who happens to be a Democrat, which also surprised me).

Anyway… I’ll just give her reply here. Note: I am posting this as a fair use quote and recognize the rights Kay Hagan may have or claim on this text.

Dear Friend,

Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns regarding the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011, more commonly referred to as the PROTECT IP Act of 2011. I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important issue.

On May 12, 2011, the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011 (S. 968) was introduced in the Senate and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. This bill would allow the Attorney General, or an intellectual property rights owner who has been harmed by an Internet site dedicated to infringing activities (ISDIA), also known as a rogue website, to take action against that site. A site would be designated as an ISDIA if their sole purpose is to facilitate copyright infringement, or promote or sale of counterfeited American works.

A recent study suggests that copyright piracy alone costs the American economy as much as $58 billion a year and countless jobs. I strongly support the goal of reducing the theft of intellectual property that is so important to North Carolina’s economy, including our budding film industry, which is why I and 40 of my bipartisan cosponsors originally cosponsored this legislation last July.

As with all proposed legislation, legitimate concerns have been raised about some of the specific provisions in this bill. I believe that supporters and opponents of the bill, all of whom agree, after all, on the need to combat the theft of American intellectual property, should work together to address those concerns. As you may know, the Senate is scheduled to begin consideration of this legislation later this month, and I intend to approach the debate and amendment process with an open mind. Through a full and robust debate, I believe we can improve the legislation, ultimately reaching an agreement that will protect intellectual property without limiting innovation and creativity or creating unintended consequences.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Archangel / January 19, 2012 / Technology

Comments

  1. eclipse - January 19, 2012 @ 12:17 pm

    Is that the “study” that assumes every downloader, if they couldn’t download something online for free, would immediately go out and purchase the same content at full retail price and never share it?

    We’ll never know, she doesn’t say….

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published / Required fields are marked *